Japan, supposedly a major power in robotics, had none to send in to Fukushima during the disaster. However, it was exactly such an extended loss of power to the cooling pumps that caused the meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear facilities. The overall goal of the Japanese government should be to provide a factual assessment of the nuclear power industry, as well as to raise questions about safety and security, placing nuclear power in the larger context of how to meet energy needs with the least harm to communities and the environment.
From the perspective outside of Japan, the reaction to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has been widespread. The reaction to the publics, experts on the ground in Japan agree that mental health challenges are the most significant issue. Stress, such as that caused by dislocation, uncertainty and concern about unseen toxicants, often manifests in physical ailments, such as heart disease. So even if radiation risks are low, people are still concerned and worried. Behavioral changes can follow, including poor dietary choices, lack of exercise and sleep deprivation, all of which can have long-term negative health consequences.
People, who lost their homes, villages and family members, and even just those who survived the earthquake, will likely continue to face mental health challenges and the physical ailments that come with stress.
Much of the damage was really the psychological stress of not knowing and of being relocated, according to U. Also, the news of the contamination of foods with radioactive substances leaking from the Fukushima nuclear reactors damaged the mutual trust between local food producers including farmers and consumers. Many rumors that were discriminatory to Fukushima and other messages damaging Fukushima people could be found on the Internet.
According to the Mainichi Daily News, the source of cesium was found to be rice straw that had been feed to the animal, but a notice of the Japanese government that was sent to cattle-farmers after the nuclear accident made no mention to the possibility that rice straw could be contaminated with radioactive materials from the plant.
In addition, the main story should have been on the 19, people killed by the tsunami and the thousands of missing individuals. However, public attention was drawn away from the needs of major restructuring, housing, developing the transportation system, and helping people who suffered because of the tsunami. It is true to be said that people should have immediately evacuate from those places, which had such difficult situations.
As long as we are safe, we do not need to care them? This was the great opportunity for me to learn many information what Fukushima is still suffering against the nuclear power plants and its affections. We still need to keep focusing on this huge issue in order to save our future. Behrens, Carl, and Mark Holt. A cautionary History of the Nuclear Age. Glossary of Environment Statistics.
Mark, David, and Mark Willacy. Markinen, Julie, and Ralph Vartabedian. Storm van Leeuwen, Jan Willem. Essay UK - http: If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom History essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question.
In regards to plants, animals, and humans, exposure to radioactive waste can cause cancer, genetic problems, and death. Which brings to mind the nature and prospects of nuclear fusion- often called the "perfect" source of power - emitting neither radioactive waste nor greenhouse gasses that add to the global warming problem. But because there is always the possibility of error in nuclear waste production, storage and disposal, there is always the risk that waste is somehow being exposed to the environment.
The symptoms of exposure range from the following:. With the vast array of symptoms, illnesses, and effects of exposure to nuclear waste, it is easy to see why this is such a strong argument against the production of nuclear power. The development and usage of nuclear weapons have become a hot topic of debate in recent years. It has always been, but even more so in the 20th and 21st centuries. Seldom do most people make the connection between nuclear weapons and nuclear power production.
It was once deemed that the production of nuclear power for the sole purpose of electricity production. In the s, President Dwight Eisenhower first came to the realization that the two concepts could be connected. As the process of linking nuclear power production and nuclear weapon development has become more evident, so has the fact that the connection is more political than historical.
The political and microeconomic aspects of energy production are vast. Because of how little the world relies on nuclear power for energy production, it only makes sense that many countries would instead use nuclear energy solely for the production of nuclear weapons.
This leaves this type of energy production in the hands of terrorist-friendly countries and organizations. In years past, nuclear power was a feasible solution to the problem. Yet another argument against the production of nuclear power lay in the fact that there are many more options available.
The world has taken notice to the natural energy that lights upon us everyday care of Mother Nature. Sun, wind, and water offer many opportunities at alternative energy sources without the aid of the environmentally detrimental energy that nuclear power provides World Nuclear Association. There is a rather large list of potential alternative energy sources that could prove to be healthier and safer options to nuclear power.
The problem with these types of energy sources is the act of harnessing them. It makes sense that if the world is willing to accommodate the cost of nuclear power exploration that it would also be willing to harness much safer means of energy production that can be found in natural resources. The argument against the production of nuclear power is a strong one. The production of nuclear power is dangerous and comes with many negative ramifications.
Nuclear disasters are tragedies that are unlike any other in history and are unnecessary. The consequences of nuclear waste exposure are immeasurable and create long lasting legacies of destruction, fear, and pain. There are too many other renewable and sustainable energy sources available that nuclear power production should no longer be an option.
The world does not rely on nuclear energy heavily enough for it to be a necessity. As politics take precedence in all things global, the protection of the planet and its inhabitants has taken the backseat.
The world once survived with nuclear power. Hopefully, we will see those days again. Listed and Ranked since Guardian News and Media, Ultius Blog, 05 Jul.
Click here for more help with MLA citations. Click here for more help with APA citations. Click here for more help with CMS citations. Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions and matches customers with highly qualified writers for sample writing, academic editing, and business writing. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions for consumers around the world. Go to Homepage current My Account my.
Nuclear reaction releases a million times more energy, as compared to hydro or wind energy. Large quantity of energy is generated from a single nuclear power plant. High Reserves Nuclear reactors make use of uranium as fuel and produces huge amounts of energy from small amounts of uranium. The Earth has the high reserves of uranium.
Nuclear power plant should not exist for the world peace with no extensive war with nuclear weapon. The energy source that needed for nuclear power plant productivity is uranium. Uranium is a scarce source that is limited to be used and it .
- Nuclear Power a Measured Risk With daily images and reports from the recent nuclear disaster that resulted from the recent Japanese earthquake and tsunami it is easy to raise questions about the safety of Nu-clear Power Plants within the United States. NUCLEAR POWER GEOGRAPHY HOMEWORK 10/27/ DAISY SOWAH FORM 5W PROS AND CONS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN THE USA Worldwide, there are nuclear power plants that supply about 16 percent of the world's electricity.
A wind power plant is a good solution but it needs space, even one turbine needs about xm space to work properly, if a malfunction appears in the turbine, it can fall down or the blades might break, and fly for thousands of meters. Nuclear Power and Power Plant Essays Brown Period 3 March 25, Nuclear Energy Nuclear energy is one of most potential energy resource available right. Nuclear Energy is one of the most potential energy in the world.